In the wake of today's #GouvCamp
Version française annoncée antérieurement
En marge du #GouvCamp, aujourd'hui
http://www.gouvcamp.org/about/
In the wake of #GouvCamp
This Wednesday, February 22, I will attend the first GouvCamp in Quebec City. My interest is twofold.
Firstly, I think it is high time that we finally put in place conditions ensuring, minimally, that investments in digital systems and applications for government services to citizens are the most relevant, appropriate, economic, flexible and durable as possible.
Secondly, I also believe that when design and code are law that bind citizens, decisions on these public devices must be made in a democratic approach involving people and concerned citizens rather than technocratic, commercial or partisan logic.
In practice, these two issues are linked. And for both, the solution lies in participatory approaches to system and application design of which I discuss a model here. Their solution also requires access to an independent public expertise, whether governmental (e.g., the Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (National institute for excellence in health and social services – INESSS) which assesses technologies and models of intervention), academic or citizen-based (such as the proposed Digital World and Democracy observatory): a subject which I will discuss shortly.
The OpenIDEO model
Recently, Catherine Roy, a colleague of mine, signaled an on-going consultation on How can we design an electoral experience accessible to all? sponsored by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. This consultation is being held on the platform OpenIDEO, a non-profit project of the international design consulting firm IDEO. OpenIDEO’s mission is to find solutions to major social challenges through a collaboration platform for contributors from around the world. (more…)
Je participe au premier GouvCamp à Québec, ce mercredi 22 février.
Mon intérêt est double.
1. Il serait grand temps qu’on mette en place des conditions assurant, minimalement, que les investissements en systèmes et applications numériques des services de l’État aux citoyens soient les plus pertinents, adéquats, économiques, souples et durables que possibles.
2. Lorsque designs et codes font loi s’imposant aux citoyens, les décisions relatives à ces dispositifs publics doivent être prises selon une logique démocratique impliquant les populations et citoyens concernés plutôt que des logiques technocratique, marchande ou partisane.
En pratique, ces deux questions sont indissociables l’une de l’autre. Pour toutes deux, la solution passe par des démarches ouvertes et participatives de conception de systèmes et d’applications.
Leur solution passe aussi par un même accès à une expertise publique indépendante, qu’elle soit gouvernementale (par exemple, l’Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS) qui évalue les technologies et modes d’intervention), universitaire ou citoyenne (comme le projet d’observatoire citoyen Monde numérique et démocratie).On s’en reparle.
From +Nestor Arellano
Text of Bill C-30 "lawful acces" / Texte du projet de loi C-30 « accès légal »
Copyright wars + usage-based billing + vertical integration + legal access = golden handcuffs networks
"Seen in the context of the copyright wars, usage-based billing and vertical integration, the Investigative Powers has the potential of posing a great threat to personal privacy in the name of security. Each measure on its own chips away at the ideals of an open Internet. If left to stand, the combined force of all four measures could transform the Internet into one of the most regulated media spaces ever known."
Dwayne Winseck
Lawful access: There are sellers of internet surveillance. There are buyers of it.
Investigators from Privacy International infiltrated closed international surveillance equipment marketing conferences
Maintenant disponible en français
Envoyez un valentin à l'Honorable Vic Toews !
Dites-lui NON à la législation « accès légal »
Le journalisme face aux vélléités de surveillance de l'État, québécois et canadien
Les outils de travail même des journalistes sont menacés
The very work tools of journalists threatened
A sudden tug of war between the Charest government and journalists caused a shock wave the echoes of which have rippled through throughout the Canadian journalistic profession. A jolt that could help realize how the “lawful access” bill introduced this Monday, Feb. 13 also concerns journalists and media organizations.
A threat
Last week, the Charest government announced that the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions and the Sureté du Québec (provincial police force) would investigate on leaks to media related to the Ian Davidson case, a retired Montreal police officer suspected of attempting to sell lists of police informants to organized crime. Neither the Minister of Public Safety Robert Dutil, nor Premier Jean Charest have agreed to guarantee that journalists would not be investigated or wiretap. (more…)
Arrêtez l’espionnage en ligne
Pétition contre surveillance sur Internet (projet de loi « accès légal »)
Le gouvernement prépare un ensemble de lois sur la surveillance électronique qui permettra aux autorités d'espionner nos courriels et autres communications personnelles (y compris
Depot du projet de loi « accès légal" » au feuilleton des avis du Parlement pour lundi
Introduction of "lawful access" bill now on the Parliament's notice paper for Monday
via +Michael Geist
Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities:
What the SOPA and PIPA debates is teaching us about digital democracy
+OpenMedia.ca's Letter to supporters
Across the country Canadians are standing against the "Internet Lockdown"
Legislation like Bill C-11 could create an Internet lockdown, where Internet users are cut off for no good reason, and vast swaths of the Internet are removed or hidden from view.
Let…